distinguishing Loew's Inc. v. Dorsey, 197 Misc. 1069, 97 N.Y.S.2d 315 (Sup.Ct. 1950)
Summary of this case from Morin v. TrupinOctober 25, 1956
Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, NATHANIEL SORKIN, J.
Henry L. Finkelstein for appellant.
Edward Pious for respondent.
The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs.
Concur: EDER, HECHT, JR., and TILZER, JJ.
Order affirmed.
distinguishing Loew's Inc. v. Dorsey, 197 Misc. 1069, 97 N.Y.S.2d 315 (Sup.Ct. 1950)
Summary of this case from Morin v. TrupinFull title:RUDES CORPORATION, Respondent, v. FARID SONS, LTD., Defendant, and…
Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Date published: Oct 25, 1956
However, Loew's was later distinguished on the ground that "Dorsey had no permanent residence and his stay in…
Morin v. TrupinIt may turn out to be that Trupin's situation resembles that of bandleader Jimmy Dorsey, who had "no…