From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rucker v. Cockrell

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
Apr 23, 2002
NO. 4:01-CV-0765-A (N.D. Tex. Apr. 23, 2002)

Opinion

NO. 4:01-CV-0765-A

April 23, 2002


ORDER


Came on for consideration the above-captioned action wherein Raymond Lee Rucker is petitioner and Janie Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, is respondent. This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 1, 2002, the United States Magistrate Judge issued his findings, conclusions, and recommendation and ordered that the parties be granted until April 22, 2002, in which to file, and not merely place in the mail, written objections thereto. Copies of the findings, conclusions, and recommendation were sent to petitioner and respondent by certified mail, return receipt requested. Return receipts have been received by the Clerk and placed in the file. Such receipts reflect that copies were received on behalf of petitioner and on behalf of respondent. Because timely objections have not been filed, further appeal is waived. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Therefore, the court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

The court ORDERS that the petitioner's motion to dismiss be, and is hereby, granted and that this action be, and is hereby, dismissed so that petitioner may exhaust his state remedies.


Summaries of

Rucker v. Cockrell

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
Apr 23, 2002
NO. 4:01-CV-0765-A (N.D. Tex. Apr. 23, 2002)
Case details for

Rucker v. Cockrell

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND LEE RUCKER, Petitioner, v. JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas

Date published: Apr 23, 2002

Citations

NO. 4:01-CV-0765-A (N.D. Tex. Apr. 23, 2002)

Citing Cases

Rucker v. Dretke

Rucker's objections are overruled. See Rucker v. Cockrell, No. 4:01-CV-765-A, 2002 WL 737148, at *2 (N.D.Tex.…