From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruckel v. Ruckel

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Feb 8, 2007
No. 09-06-033 CV (Tex. App. Feb. 8, 2007)

Opinion

No. 09-06-033 CV

Submitted on February 1, 2007.

Opinion Delivered February 8, 2007.

On Appeal from the 1-A District Court. Jasper County, Texas. Trial Cause No. 20971.

Before MCKEITHEN, C.J., KREGER and HORTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Lon Clarke Ruckel appealed an order denying his motion to clarify a qualified domestic relations order and ordering him to pay attorney's fees to the opposing party, Deborah Deniese Ruckel Yates. The appeal was submitted without briefs because the appellant failed to file his brief by September 20, 2006, the due date on the final extension granted for filing a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a), (d). On January 11, 2007, we notified the parties that the appeal would be advanced without oral argument. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.9. In the absence of a brief assigning error, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

APPEAL DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Ruckel v. Ruckel

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Feb 8, 2007
No. 09-06-033 CV (Tex. App. Feb. 8, 2007)
Case details for

Ruckel v. Ruckel

Case Details

Full title:LON CLARKE RUCKEL, Appellant v. DEBORAH DENIESE RUCKEL, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Feb 8, 2007

Citations

No. 09-06-033 CV (Tex. App. Feb. 8, 2007)