From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruby v. Casey's General Store, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Sep 28, 2011
803 N.W.2d 915 (Minn. 2011)

Opinion

No. A11–0964.

2011-09-28

Wendy C. RUBY, Respondent,v.CASEY'S GENERAL STORE, INC., and CCMSI, Relators,andInjured Workers' Pharmacy, Intervenor.


DeAnna M. McCashin, Schoep & McCashin, Chtd., Alexandria, MN, for respondent.

Timothy S. Crom, Matthew P. Bandt, Jardine, Logan & O'Brien, P.L.L.P., Lake Elmo, MN, for relators.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 29, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT

/s/David R. Stras

Associate Justice


Summaries of

Ruby v. Casey's General Store, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Sep 28, 2011
803 N.W.2d 915 (Minn. 2011)
Case details for

Ruby v. Casey's General Store, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Wendy C. Ruby, Respondent, v. Casey's General Store, Inc., and CCMSI…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

803 N.W.2d 915 (Minn. 2011)