From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruble v. Rinker Material Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 1, 2011
59 So. 3d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. 1D10-5713.

January 24, 2011. Rehearing Denied March 1, 2011.

Sidney Marts, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004) (reiterating that habeas corpus cannot be used to litigate issues that could have been or were raised on direct appeal or in postconviction motions).

Additionally, due to petitioner's abuse of the legal process by his repeated pro se filings attacking his conviction and sentence, this court ordered petitioner to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999) (requiring that courts "first provide notice and an opportunity to respond before preventing [a] litigant from bringing further attacks on his conviction and sentence."). Petitioner's response to the show cause order does not provide a legal basis to prohibit the imposition of sanctions.

As such, because it is apparent that petitioner's continued and repeated attacks on his conviction and sentence have become an abuse of the legal process, we hold that he is barred from future pro se filings in this court concerning Escambia County Circuit Court case number 2007-CF-6067. The Clerk of the Court is directed not to accept any future filings concerning this case unless they are signed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar.

Petitioner is warned that any future filings which violate the terms of this opinion may result in a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures as provided in section 944.279, Florida Statutes (2010) (providing that a prisoner who is found by a court to have brought a frivolous suit, action, claim, proceeding or appeal is subject to disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department of Corrections). Fla.R.App.P. 9.410.

BENTON, C.J., KAHN and WETHERELL, JJ, concur.


Summaries of

Ruble v. Rinker Material Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 1, 2011
59 So. 3d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

Ruble v. Rinker Material Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Sidney MARTS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 1, 2011

Citations

59 So. 3d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Citing Cases

Marts v. Jones

" Id. Petitioner had previously been barred from filing pro se motions in the First District Court of Appeal…

Marts v. Inch

Petitioner's claim that state exhaustion was unavailable is not supported by the record. First, although…