From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rubinstein v. Rubinstein

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 21, 1953
113 N.E.2d 149 (N.Y. 1953)

Opinion

Argued January 19, 1953

Decided May 21, 1953

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, BREITEL, J.

John F.X. Finn and David Brady for appellant.

George P. Halperin and Leon Dicker for Serge Rubinstein, respondent.

Leslie Kirsch for Konrad Sztykgold and others, respondents.

Edwin B. Wolchok for British American Equities, Inc., and others, respondents.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. The trial court, as it had a right to do, took and passed on the account between the parties, and its rulings on the matters involved in that accounting are sustained by the record. No opinion.

Concur: LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ. LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., deceased.


Summaries of

Rubinstein v. Rubinstein

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 21, 1953
113 N.E.2d 149 (N.Y. 1953)
Case details for

Rubinstein v. Rubinstein

Case Details

Full title:VALERIE RUBINSTEIN, as Executrix of ANDRE RUBINSTEIN, Deceased, Appellant…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 21, 1953

Citations

113 N.E.2d 149 (N.Y. 1953)
113 N.E.2d 149

Citing Cases

Seifer v. Tuttle

In view of this language, the release cannot be held conclusive and sufficient to bar this action as a matter…

Nadal v. Childs Securities Corp.

Such result would follow from the application of the well-established rule that where "a release contains a…