From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rubinstein v. Bouard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 18, 1941
262 App. Div. 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Opinion

June 18, 1941.

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County.

Present — Martin, P.J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.


The question as to whether defendant Chosen Corporation, Limited, is doing business within this State so as to render it amenable to the service of process cannot properly be resolved upon affidavits. A reference, at which a full and adequate presentation of the testimony may be had, should be ordered to aid the court in determining the factual issue.

The order should be modified by referring the issues to an official referee who is to hear and report to the Special Term, and as so modified, affirmed, with costs to appellant.


Order unanimously modified by referring the issues to an official referee to hear and report to Special Term, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the appellant. Settle order on notice. [ 176 Misc. 680.]


Summaries of

Rubinstein v. Bouard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 18, 1941
262 App. Div. 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)
Case details for

Rubinstein v. Bouard

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE RUBINSTEIN and VALERIE RUBINSTEIN, Suing on Their Own Behalf and on…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1941

Citations

262 App. Div. 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)