From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rubin v. Schottenstein

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jul 7, 1997
120 F.3d 603 (6th Cir. 1997)

Opinion

No. 96-3017.

Decided July 7, 1997.

BEFORE: MARTIN, Chief Judge; MERRITT, KENNEDY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE and COLE, Circuit Judges.


A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and the case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

It is further ORDERED that the appellant file a supplemental brief not later than Friday, August 22, 1997, and the appellee file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, September 22, 1997. The Clerk will schedule this case for argument as directed by the court.


Summaries of

Rubin v. Schottenstein

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jul 7, 1997
120 F.3d 603 (6th Cir. 1997)
Case details for

Rubin v. Schottenstein

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT E. RUBIN; PATRICIA COHEN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. SCHOTTENSTEIN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Jul 7, 1997

Citations

120 F.3d 603 (6th Cir. 1997)

Citing Cases

Rubin v. Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn

A majority of the active judges of the court voted to rehear the case en banc, and the panel's judgment was…