From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rubin v. Rubin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 13, 2003
305 A.D.2d 198 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1141N

May 13, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Lobis, J.), entered December 2, 2002, which granted defendant's motion for an automatic stay pursuant to CPLR 5519(a)(6), staying the enforcement of that portion of the parties' amended judgment of divorce requiring defendant to vacate a residence located in the town of Southampton, New York, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Robert Z. Dorish, for plaintiff-appellant.

William S. Beslow, for defendant-respondent.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Saxe, Lerner, Marlow, JJ.


This Court's prior denial of defendant's motion for a discretionary stay did not prevent defendant from seeking an automatic stay upon the posting of an undertaking (see Pan Am. World Airways, Inc. v. Overseas Raleigh Mfg., Ltd., 49 N.Y.2d 780).

We have reviewed plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Rubin v. Rubin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 13, 2003
305 A.D.2d 198 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Rubin v. Rubin

Case Details

Full title:Robert M. Rubin, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robin K.W. Rubin…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 13, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 198 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
758 N.Y.S.2d 801

Citing Cases

Andrada Owners Corp. v. Digrazia

Petitioner argues that Respondent should be precluded from seeking an undertaking and the benefit of the…

Andrada Owners Corp. v. Digrazia

Petitioner argues that Respondent should be precluded from seeking an undertaking and the benefit of the…