From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rubin v. O'Donnell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1971
37 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Opinion

October 18, 1971


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 31, 1969, in favor of defendant upon a jury verdict at a trial of the issues of liability only. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The questions of fact have not been considered. Over objection, defense counsel was permitted to introduce into evidence a police accident report made after the accident by an officer who was not an eyewitness and based upon information given to him. This was hearsay and inadmissible under Johnson v. Lutz ( 253 N.Y. 124). That portion of the trial court's charge to the jury relating to an understanding of sections of the Vehicle and Traffic Law by an infant five years and ten months of age was also prejudicial error ( Dugan v. Dieber, 32 A.D.2d 815). Rabin, P.J., Hopkins, Munder, Gulotta and Brennan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rubin v. O'Donnell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1971
37 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)
Case details for

Rubin v. O'Donnell

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL RUBIN, an Infant, by His Father and Natural Guardian, HERBERT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 18, 1971

Citations

37 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Citing Cases

L.J. v. Jing Zhang

(Id.). "This court has stated, on more than one occasion, that a child of tender years is not to be charged…

Branch v. Stehr

We agree with Trial Term's conclusion that the jury's verdict was against the weight of the evidence. This…