Opinion
1:20-cv-10208-LGS-KHP
09-08-2022
Lise Rubin, Plaintiff, v. New York City Board of Education, et al., Defendants,
Audrey J. Juarez, Assistant Corporation Counsel; Elisheva Rosen, Assistant Corporation Counsel Attorneys for Defendants,
Audrey J. Juarez, Assistant Corporation Counsel; Elisheva Rosen, Assistant Corporation Counsel Attorneys for Defendants,
LETTER MOTION / REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE AND INTERVENTION - RECUSAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE PARKER ALTERNATIVELY, FOR A HEARING BEFORE JUDGE SCHOFIELD
Dear Judge Schofield;
This Plaintiff continues to be abusively deprived of her rights to Due Process and Equal Protection Under Law by the on-going proceedings. Today the court behaved in an Outrageous manner.
In July and August, Judge Parker refused to address the concerns raised by Plaintiff, including hearing cross motions including a Motion for Rule 11b Sanctions, Relief being to strike / remove some or all of the false representations and documents submit with the intent to harass, and in clear violation of the FRCP.
In August, Judge Parker created a fictional before-the-fact, Pro forma, Default Judgment, ignoring her prior explanation of her behavior, of Sua Sponte vacating Defendant Defaults; and forging ahead in denying my case be heard on the merits.
Today she allowed the Defendants [Docket #218] to not provide any reply brief on their Motion to Dismiss, pretending that I have not submit cross motions and a substantive Response and Opposition; and also ignoring my Letter Motion sent today [#217]. This is outrageous.
From the beginning, Judge Parker has taken the position of advocate for the New York City Law Dept. and the BOE defendants. It appears that she continues her mode of operating at Proskauer Rose, on behalf of employers. I am not the first plaintiff to make this observation. On the occasions that she uses citations, they not support her actions.
As I wrote in this morning's letter, this situation is also impeding your review of the Magistrate's Report, as you will have to send it back so that my meritorious Response and Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Docket #214] will be given consideration.
Please place a Stay on this action and replace J. Parker with a judge who is not overtly contemptuous of civil rights and civil rights plaintiffs.
I ask to be heard on this matter by yourself.
Respectfully Submit, Lise Rubin Electronically signed.