From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rubin v. New Sunrise Inv. Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 12, 1992
596 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

Nos. 90-2197, 90-2198 and 90-2895.

March 3, 1992. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc May 12, 1992.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Henry Ferro, Judge.

Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum Zavertnik and Leonard H. Rubin, Miami, for appellant.

Shalle Stephen Fine; Bedzow Korn Kan Glaser and Allan M. Glaser, Miami, for appellees New Sunrise Inv. Corp., and Herman Cohen.

Karen A. Gievers, Miami, for appellee Charlotte Vogel.

Before HUBBART, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.


Affirmed. See Hynd v. Ireland, 582 So.2d 772 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Steigman v. Danese, 502 So.2d 463 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 511 So.2d 998 (Fla. 1987); Tullo v. Horner, 296 So.2d 502 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); § 95.031(2).


Summaries of

Rubin v. New Sunrise Inv. Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 12, 1992
596 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Rubin v. New Sunrise Inv. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SANDRA RUBIN, F/K/A SANDRA COHEN, APPELLANT, v. NEW SUNRISE INVESTMENT…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 12, 1992

Citations

596 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)