From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rubenstein v. Silbert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 25, 1952
279 App. Div. 878 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

February 25, 1952.

Appeal from Kings County.


Order modified to the extent of providing that the trial of the action take place in Nassau County, that the transfer of filed papers be from the office of the Clerk of the County of Kings to that of the Clerk of the County of Nassau, and that the title of the consolidated action show the venue in Nassau County. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. The affidavit in support of the motion shows no facts which should lead the court in its discretion to override the provisions of section 341-e of the Village Law. ( Bagan v. Fritz, 274 App. Div. 1082.) Carswell, Acting P.J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur. [ 200 Misc. 399.]


Summaries of

Rubenstein v. Silbert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 25, 1952
279 App. Div. 878 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Rubenstein v. Silbert

Case Details

Full title:DORA RUBENSTEIN et al., Respondents, v. BERNARD R. SILBERT, Defendant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 25, 1952

Citations

279 App. Div. 878 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Citing Cases

Spadaccini v. City of New York

Section 182-b is a venue statute which stipulates where an action must be commenced against the City of New…

Braver v. C. Nassau O. A. Ser

The place of trial of all actions against a county is specified in the CPLR as any appropriate court within…