From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rubenfeld v. Great Park Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1954
283 App. Div. 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Opinion

February 1, 1954.


Defendants Great Park Corporation, Feldman and Alper appeal from so much of an order as denied their motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed on the authority of Hornstein v. Podwitz ( 254 N.Y. 443) and Tatarsky v. Wavecrest Bldg. Corp. ( 268 App. Div. 885), with $10 costs and disbursements. Adel, Acting P.J., Wenzel, Schmidt, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rubenfeld v. Great Park Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1954
283 App. Div. 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)
Case details for

Rubenfeld v. Great Park Corporation

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH RUBENFELD, Doing Business under the Name of ALLIED REALTIES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1954

Citations

283 App. Div. 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)