From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rubel Corporation v. Hinds

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

October, 1931.


Order granting injunction pendente lite as against defendant Hinds affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Order granting injunction pendente lite as against defendant Jersey Meadow-Gold Co., Inc., reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied upon the ground that the record does not establish a willful interference with the contract made between the plaintiff and defendant Hinds. We refrain from further expression upon the merits as to both defendants, leaving it to the trial court to determine the rights of the parties according to the facts upon findings of fact and law. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rubel Corporation v. Hinds

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Rubel Corporation v. Hinds

Case Details

Full title:RUBEL CORPORATION, Respondent, v. SAMUEL HINDS, Doing Business under the…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1931

Citations

234 App. Div. 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)