From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rubang v. U.S. Bank Tr.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 16, 2021
2:18-cv-02349 TLN AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2021)

Opinion

2:18-cv-02349 TLN AC

09-16-2021

GONZALO R. RUBANG, JR., Plaintiff, v. US BANK TRUST, NA, Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff was pro se in this closed case, and accordingly the action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On September 10, 2021, plaintiff filed a notice regarding motion to compel, the contents of which are directed to the Ninth Circuit. ECF No. 34. Plaintiffs case was closed on April 18, 2019 (ECF NO. 27), and the Ninth Circuit dismissed his appeal and issued its mandate on February 20, 2020 (ECF No. 32). Plaintiff is advised that documents filed since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings. Plaintiffs notice at ECF No. 34 will, accordingly, not be considered.


Summaries of

Rubang v. U.S. Bank Tr.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 16, 2021
2:18-cv-02349 TLN AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Rubang v. U.S. Bank Tr.

Case Details

Full title:GONZALO R. RUBANG, JR., Plaintiff, v. US BANK TRUST, NA, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 16, 2021

Citations

2:18-cv-02349 TLN AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2021)