From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruark v. Colorado

U.S.
Jun 22, 1964
378 U.S. 585 (1964)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.

No. 1173, Misc.

Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John E. Bush, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.


The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Colorado for consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.


For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Smith v. Crouse, ante, p. 584, I would set this case for argument.


Summaries of

Ruark v. Colorado

U.S.
Jun 22, 1964
378 U.S. 585 (1964)
Case details for

Ruark v. Colorado

Case Details

Full title:RUARK v . COLORADO

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 22, 1964

Citations

378 U.S. 585 (1964)

Citing Cases

Ruark v. Tinsley

Ruark v. People, 150 Colo. 289, 372 P.2d 158. Ruark v. Colorado, 371 U.S. 913, 83 S. Ct. 262, 9 L.Ed.2d 173.…

Cruz v. Patterson

Relief was denied in the trial court on October 13, 1964, such denial being affirmed by the State Supreme…