From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R.T.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 18, 1996
679 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 94-04120.

September 18, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Polk County, Charles A. Davis, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Chief of Criminal Law, Tampa, for Appellee.


We affirm the order adjudicating R.T.D. delinquent and the disposition of that adjudication. We strike the imposition of $50 to the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund and $75 as a public defender fee because the trial court did not cite any statutory authority for these costs in its order. If, on remand, the trial court reimposes these costs, it must cite the specific statutes authorizing the costs. Williams v. State, 661 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Sutton. v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Affirmed as modified, and remanded with instructions.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

R.T.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 18, 1996
679 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

R.T.D. v. State

Case Details

Full title:R.T.D., APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Sep 18, 1996

Citations

679 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

I.B. v. State

Further, the record clearly reflects that the court stated the amount and basis for the statutorily…

King v. State

Id. at 114. Then, the following year, this more technical language gained some traction in R.T.D. v. State,…