Rroku v. Cole

Full title: MARJAN RROKU v. DAVID C. COLE, et al.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Sep 9, 2016

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-00294 (W.D. La. Sep. 9, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-00294

09-09-2016

MARJAN RROKU v. DAVID C. COLE, et al.

CHIEF JUDGE DRELL

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after independent (de novo) review of the record including the objections filed herein, and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Hartnett's motion to dismiss (Doc. 29) is GRANTED and Rroku's complaint against Hartnett is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Rroku's action against Cole is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED Rroku's complaint against Woods is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 4(m).

THUS ORDERED AND SIGNED in Chambers at Alexandria, Louisiana on this 9^th day of September, 2016.

/s/_________

CHIEF JUDGE DEE D. DRELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT