From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RP Wynstone, LP v. New Hanover Twp.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 23, 2024
Civil Action 24-959 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 23, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 24-959

12-23-2024

RP WYNSTONE, LP, ET AL. Plaintiff, v. NEW HANOVER TOWNSHIP, ET AL., Defendant.


ORDER

JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of December 2024, upon consideration of Defendants' New Hanover Township, New Hanover Township Authority, Board of Supervisors of New Hanover Township, Jamie Gwynn, William Ross Snook, Kurt Zebrowski, Marie Livelsberger, Boone Flint, Thomas Miskiewicz, Charles Garner, Russel Oister, Susan Smith, and William Moyer's Motion to Stay Proceedings (Doc. No. 33), Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 39), Defendants' Reply (Doc. No. 41), the arguments of counsel at the hearing held on October 25, 2024, and in accordance with the Opinion issued on this date, it is ORDERED that the Motion to Stay Proceedings (Doc. No. 33) is DENIED.


Summaries of

RP Wynstone, LP v. New Hanover Twp.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 23, 2024
Civil Action 24-959 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 23, 2024)
Case details for

RP Wynstone, LP v. New Hanover Twp.

Case Details

Full title:RP WYNSTONE, LP, ET AL. Plaintiff, v. NEW HANOVER TOWNSHIP, ET AL.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 23, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 24-959 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 23, 2024)