From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rozier v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 30, 1993
621 So. 2d 589 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-2184.

July 30, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County; Dorothy J. Russell, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kenneth Witts, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


The state concedes that the discretionary costs imposed upon Karen Rozier were assessed without notice or opportunity to be heard contrary to Williams v. State, 591 So.2d 295 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). See Klarstrom v. State, 610 So.2d 102 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). Additionally, the transcript of the sentencing hearing reflects that a "fine" of $455 was orally imposed, but costs were not. The judgment reflects that costs of $405 were imposed, but a fine was not.

We vacate the judgment for costs in the amount of $405 and remand for clarification and entry of an amended judgment after notice and an opportunity to be heard is afforded the defendant.

JUDGMENT VACATED IN PART; CAUSE REMANDED.

W. SHARP, PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rozier v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 30, 1993
621 So. 2d 589 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Rozier v. State

Case Details

Full title:KAREN ROZIER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jul 30, 1993

Citations

621 So. 2d 589 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)