ROZA v. UNITED STATES

Full title: Edward Da ROZA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court: Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 11, 1931

48 F.2d 1027 (9th Cir. 1931)

Opinion

No. 6309.

April 6, 1931. Rehearing Denied May 11, 1931.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Northern District of California; Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge.

Ernest Spagnoli, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Geo. J. Hatfield, U.S. Atty., and A.E. Bagshaw, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal.

Before RUDKIN, WILBUR, and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges.

SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.

In this case, as in that of Edward Da Roza v. United States (No. 6310, C.C.A.) 48 F.2d 1025, this day decided, the defendant pleaded guilty to an indictment charging the manufacture of intoxicating liquor in violation of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA). He was sentenced to imprisonment, the period of imprisonment to run concurrently with the period of imprisonment imposed in said case, No. 6310.

All of the errors assigned in this case have been considered and disposed of in case No. 6310, and the judgment is the same.

Judgment affirmed.