From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Royster v. Sniezek

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 29, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-2651 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 29, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-2651

06-29-2012

TIFFANY L. ROYSTER Plaintiff v. T.R. SNIEZEK, et al. Defendants


(Chief Judge Kane)

(Magistrate Judge Smyser)


ORDER

Before the Court in the above-captioned action is a June 11, 2012 report and recommendation of the magistrate judge. No timely objections have been filed.

Accordingly, this 29th day of June 2012, upon review of the record and the applicable law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Smyser.

2) The remaining defendants, i.e. the defendants identified as "various unknown agents and employees of the Federal Bureau of Prisons whose names and addresses are unknown and undiscoverable at this time," are dismissed in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m).

3) The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

________________

Yvette Kane, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Royster v. Sniezek

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 29, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-2651 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Royster v. Sniezek

Case Details

Full title:TIFFANY L. ROYSTER Plaintiff v. T.R. SNIEZEK, et al. Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jun 29, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-2651 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 29, 2012)