Royster v. Morgan

Full title: ROBERT EARL ROYSTER, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF DAVID MORGAN, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Mar 23, 2011

Case No. 3:10cv31/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Mar. 23, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:10cv31/LAC/EMT.

March 23, 2011

ORDER

LACEY COLLIER, District Judge

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 2, 2011 (Doc. 42). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

3. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22^nd day of March, 2011.