From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Royster v. American Cyanamid Co.

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Sep 25, 2006
Case No.: 3:06cv358/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Sep. 25, 2006)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:06cv358/MCR/MD.

September 25, 2006


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated August 25, 2006. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The plaintiff's federal claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

3. The plaintiff's state law claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to his re-filing it in state court.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.


Summaries of

Royster v. American Cyanamid Co.

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Sep 25, 2006
Case No.: 3:06cv358/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Sep. 25, 2006)
Case details for

Royster v. American Cyanamid Co.

Case Details

Full title:DARYL A. ROYSTER, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN CYANAMID CO., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Sep 25, 2006

Citations

Case No.: 3:06cv358/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Sep. 25, 2006)

Citing Cases

Byng v. Kelly

Lombardi, 485 F.3d at 79 n.3. Courts have found there is no special relationship between a public housing…