From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roybal v. Torres

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 20, 2021
LA CV21-05612 JAK (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2021)

Opinion

LA CV21-05612 JAK (JEMx)

10-20-2021

Edward R. Roybal, Jr. v. Crystal Torres, et al.


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

HONORABLE JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION RE CRYSTAL TORRES, OSCAR ACEVEDO, AND RAMON MIRAMONTES

The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than October 25, 2021 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution regarding overdue responses, as to Crystal Torres, Oscar Acevedo, and Ramon Miramontes. Pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff shall file an application requesting the entry of default. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the filing of an application, which complies with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Failure to respond will result in the dismissal of this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Roybal v. Torres

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 20, 2021
LA CV21-05612 JAK (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Roybal v. Torres

Case Details

Full title:Edward R. Roybal, Jr. v. Crystal Torres, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 20, 2021

Citations

LA CV21-05612 JAK (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2021)