From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Royal v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 14, 1999
736 So. 2d 157 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 99-1510.

Opinion filed July 14, 1999.

An appeal under Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(i) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Michael A. Genden, Judge, L.T. No. 96-19440.

Arthur James Royal, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, LEVY and GREEN, JJ.


As the trial court's exercise of discretion in ruling on a motion for mitigation pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) is not subject to review on appeal, the appeal is dismissed. See Lusskin v. State, 717 So.2d 1076, 1077 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Moya v. State, 668 So.2d 279, 280 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Bourjolly v. State, 623 So.2d 870 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). However, points I and II of the motion to mitigate raise claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and a constitutional challenge to his sentencing. The dismissal of this appeal is without prejudice to appellant to file a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We express no view on the merits of any such motion.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Royal v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 14, 1999
736 So. 2d 157 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Royal v. State

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR JAMES ROYAL, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 14, 1999

Citations

736 So. 2d 157 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Viera v. State

Staveley v. State, 866 So.2d 1239, 1240 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Daniels v. State, 568 So.2d 63, 64 (Fla. 1st…

Thomas v. State

Oliver Thomas appeals the denial of a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) motion to mitigate his…