From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Royal v. Hofer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 15, 2008
No. CIV S-07-0474 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0474 GEB DAD P.

October 15, 2008


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed September 3, 2008, this court directed plaintiff to file, within thirty days, a status report. Thirty days have since passed, and plaintiff has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to the court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110.

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Royal v. Hofer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 15, 2008
No. CIV S-07-0474 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2008)
Case details for

Royal v. Hofer

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN ROYAL, Plaintiff, v. LEE T. HOFER, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 15, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-0474 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2008)