Summary
In Royal Development Co. v. Bennett (supra) the Attorney-General denied the examination was sought solely to assist intervenors in their proof of claims and he asserted that no final determination had been made by him as to what criminal action, if any, might be brought against the corporate officers and directors.
Summary of this case from People v. Anaconda Cable Co.Opinion
Argued September 30, 1935
Decided October 15, 1935
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
David H. Shearer and Adolph J. Rodenbeck for appellant.
John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General ( Henry Epstein and James P. Cotter, of counsel), for respondent.
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative. No opinion.
Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ.