From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Royal Caribbean Cruise v. Killen

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 8, 2006
920 So. 2d 701 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 3D05-2528.

February 8, 2006.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ronald M. Friedman, Judge.

Mase, Gassenheimer Lara and Beverly D. Eisenstadt, Miami, for petitioner.

Munch and Munch and Jacob J. Munch, Tampa, for respondent.

Before WELLS and CORTIÑAS, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.


As Respondent concedes that the accident reports at issue are protected as work product and are not discoverable absent a showing of need and inability to obtain the substantial equivalent without undue hardship, we dismiss the instant petition for a writ of certiorari. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.280(b)(3); Intercontinental Properties, Inc. v. Samy, 685 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); DeBartolo-Aventura, Inc. v. Hernandez, 638 So.2d 988 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).

Petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Royal Caribbean Cruise v. Killen

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 8, 2006
920 So. 2d 701 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Royal Caribbean Cruise v. Killen

Case Details

Full title:ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISE LINES, LTD., Petitioner, v. Margaret KILLEN…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 8, 2006

Citations

920 So. 2d 701 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)