Opinion
22-cv-12691
09-25-2023
ROYAL CAR CENTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. MANNHEIM LUXURY MOTORS, INC., et al., Defendants.
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SERVE DEFENDANT WITH NOTICE OF HEARING
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
In this action, Plaintiff Royal Car Center, Inc. (“RCC”) alleges that Defendant Mannheim Luxury Motors, Inc. (“Mannheim”) has refused to pay for two luxury vehicles that Mannheim purchased from RCC. (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) Mannheim has not appeared in this action, and it has not filed any response to the Complaint. (See Dkt.) The Clerk of the Court entered a default against Mannheim on February 16, 2023. (See Default, ECF No. 8.) RCC filed a motion for default judgment against Mannheim on March 7, 2023 (see Mot., ECF No. 11), and the Court denied the motion without prejudice on August 3, 2023. (See Order, ECF No. 20.)
On August 13, 2023, RCC filed a renewed motion for a default judgment against Mannheim. (See Renewed Mot., ECF No. 21.) The Court has now issued a Notice of Hearing setting RCC's renewed motion for a Zoom electronic hearing on Monday, October 16, 2023, at 1:00 pm .
By no later than October 6, 2023 , RCC shall serve Mannheim with (1) the Notice of Hearing, (2) this order, and (3) a proposed default judgment. In addition, by no later than October 6, 2023 , RCC shall file a Certificate of Service on the docket confirming that it has served Mannheim with these documents. Finally, by no later than October 6, 2023 , RCC shall submit the proposed default judgment to the Court through the Utilities function of CM/ECF. If RCC does not comply with this order as set forth in this paragraph, the Court may deny its motion for a default judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on September 25, 2023, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail.