Roy v. Brahmbhatt

Full title: VIJAY N. ROY, Plaintiff, v. BIMAL BRAHMBHATT, ET AL., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Jun 3, 2009

Civil Action No. 07-5082 (PGS) (D.N.J. Jun. 3, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-5082 (PGS).

June 3, 2009

ORDER

PETER SHERIDAN, District Judge

A Report and Recommendation was filed on March 26, 2009 recommending that this Court deny Defendants' motion to dismiss this action for lack of personal jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2). The parties were given notice that they had ten days within which to object to the Report and Recommendation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.1(c)(2). No objections having been received, and the Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation de novo, and good cause appearing;

It is, on this 3 day of June, 2009,

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Esther Salas at Docket Entry No. 49 is hereby adopted as the opinion of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss at Docket Entry No. 39 is DENIED.