Roy C. Knapp Sons, Inc. v. County of Putnam

1 Citing case

  1. Namasco Corp. v. N. Y. Hotel Trade Coun.

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 31741 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2007)

    The Museum's reliance on MRW Constr. Co. v City of New York ( 223 AD2d 473 [1st Dept], lv denied 88 NY2d 803) is unavailing for the same reason. That case, like the others mentioned above, involved a public contract with nearly identical notice and documentation requirements (id. at 473; see also Roy C. Knapp Sons, Inc. v County of Putnam, 212 AD2d 770, 771 [2nd Dept 1995] [public contract with similar notice of claim requirements]). Thus, the branch of the Museum's motion for partial summary judgment seeking dismissal of Pecker's claims for failure to comply with the Contract's notice requirement