From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roxauna M. v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Aug 22, 2018
Docket no. 1:17-cv-350-NT (D. Me. Aug. 22, 2018)

Opinion

Docket no. 1:17-cv-350-NT

08-22-2018

ROXAUNA M., Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On July 20, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision. (ECF No. 21). The time within which to file objections has expired, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and the Commissioner's Decision is AFFIRMED.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Nancy Torresen

United States Chief District Judge Dated this 22nd day of August, 2018.


Summaries of

Roxauna M. v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Aug 22, 2018
Docket no. 1:17-cv-350-NT (D. Me. Aug. 22, 2018)
Case details for

Roxauna M. v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:ROXAUNA M., Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Aug 22, 2018

Citations

Docket no. 1:17-cv-350-NT (D. Me. Aug. 22, 2018)

Citing Cases

Holland v. U.S. Soc. Sec. Comm'n

he ALJ's statement concerning Holland's lack of treatment does not run afoul of SSR 16-3p. See Christopher B.…