From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rowland v. City of Memphis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 17, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-02040-JPM-tmp (W.D. Tenn. Dec. 17, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-02040-JPM-tmp

12-17-2013

RAY ROWLAND, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; DISMISSING

DEFENDANTS JOSEPH BENYA, ROBERT TUTT, AND MAHAJJ ABDUL-BAAQEE

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on December 17, 2013. (ECF No. 27.) In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends "that Officers Joseph Ben[ya], Robert Tutt, and Mahajj Abdul-Baaqee be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure] 4(m)." (Id. at PageID 191.) The Report and Recommendation states that at a hearing before the Magistrate Judge on December 17, 2013, "Plaintiff stated he had no objection to dismissing these defendants without prejudice." (Id.)

Under Rule 4(m), "[i]f a defendant is not served within 120 days after the complaint is filed, the court - on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff - must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

When documents are not internally paginated, or when a single filing contains multiple documents, the Court refers to the Page Identification ("PageID") number located at the top right of documents filed on the Case Management/Electronic Case Files system.

When there are no objections to a Magistrate Judge's recommendation, "the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee notes. On clear-error review, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 27) in its entirety.

Accordingly, all claims against Defendants Joseph Benya, Robert Tutt, and Mahajj Abdul-Baaqee are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 17th day of December, 2013.

______________

JON P. McCALLA

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rowland v. City of Memphis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 17, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-02040-JPM-tmp (W.D. Tenn. Dec. 17, 2013)
Case details for

Rowland v. City of Memphis

Case Details

Full title:RAY ROWLAND, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 17, 2013

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-02040-JPM-tmp (W.D. Tenn. Dec. 17, 2013)