Opinion
No. 173, 1999.
Submitted: February 15, 2000.
Decided: February 25, 2000.
Appeal from Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County, C.A. No. 97C-09-018 WTQ.
AFFIRMED.
Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, WALSH, HOLLAND, HARTNETT and BERGER, Justices, constituting the Court en Banc.
ORDER
This 25th day of February 2000, the Court, having carefully considered on this appeal and cross-appeal the decisions and orders of the Superior Court dated March 26, 1998, February 26, 1999, March 30, 1999, and April 15, 1999, as well as the briefs of the parties and their contentions in oral argument, has determined as follows.
(1) Summary judgment was properly granted;
(2) To the extent that: (a) the issues raised on appeal and cross-appeal are factual, the record evidence supports the trial judge's factual findings; (b) the errors alleged on appeal and cross-appeal are attributed to an abuse of discretion, the record does not support those assertions; (c) the issues raised on appeal and cross-appeal are legal, they are controlled by settled Delaware law, which was properly applied.
(3) This Court's decision affirming the Superior Court's award of attorney's fees to appellants challenged by appellees on cross-appeal is based on the unique circumstances of this case and should not be considered precedent. Cf. Brehm v. Eisner, Del. Supr., ___ A.2d ___, No. 469, 1998, at 24 n. 41, Veasey, C.J. (Feb. 9, 2000).
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.