From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rowl v. Smith Debnam Narron Wyche Saintsing & Myers, LLP

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 29, 2010
376 F. App'x 329 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-1701.

April 5, 2010.

April 29, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:07-cv-O0491-RJC-DLH).

Pamela P. Keenan, Kirschbaum, Nanney, Keenan Griffin, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jon Berkelhammer, Smith Moore, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina; Jeffrey Phillips MacHarg, Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Willard Travis Barkley, Barkley Law Offices, P.C., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Pauline Rowl appeals the district court's orders dismissing her federal civil rights suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rowl v. Smith Debnam Narron Wyche Saintsing Myers, LLP, No. 3:07-cv-00491-RJC-DLH, 2009 WL 187575 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 23, 2009) (June 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Rowl v. Smith Debnam Narron Wyche Saintsing & Myers, LLP

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 29, 2010
376 F. App'x 329 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Rowl v. Smith Debnam Narron Wyche Saintsing & Myers, LLP

Case Details

Full title:Pauline ROWL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SMITH DEBNAM NARRON WYCHE SAINTSING…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Apr 29, 2010

Citations

376 F. App'x 329 (4th Cir. 2010)