From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rowell v. Barry

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 25, 2011
3:11-cv-00021-ECR-VPC (D. Nev. Mar. 25, 2011)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00021-ECR-VPC.

March 25, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 17, 2011, the court issued an order denying plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis because he has had "three strikes" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (docket #3). The court directed plaintiff to submit the $350.00 filing fee within thirty (30) days. The court expressly warned plaintiff that failure to respond to this court's order would result in dismissal of this action. The order was served on plaintiff at his address of record.

More than the allotted time has elapsed and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or responded this court's order in any manner. Accordingly, this entire action will be dismissed for failure to comply with the court's order.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for the failure of plaintiff to comply with this court's order to pay the filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and close this case.

DATED this 24th day of March 2011.


Summaries of

Rowell v. Barry

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 25, 2011
3:11-cv-00021-ECR-VPC (D. Nev. Mar. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Rowell v. Barry

Case Details

Full title:LAMARR ROWELL, #61987 Plaintiff, v. R. BARRY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Mar 25, 2011

Citations

3:11-cv-00021-ECR-VPC (D. Nev. Mar. 25, 2011)