But there is an obverse side to the coin of public policy and consideration must be given to the fact that society is ill-served by a legally commanded continuance of a marriage which exists in name only.Rowe v. Rowe, No. M1999-01535-COA-R3-CV, 2000 WL 679225, at *2 (Tenn.Ct.App. M.S., filed May 25, 2000) (quoting Farrar v. Farrar, 553 S.W.2d 741, 744-45 (Tenn. 1977)).