Rowe v. Rowe

1 Citing case

  1. Boyatt v. Boyatt

    248 S.W.3d 144 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007)

    But there is an obverse side to the coin of public policy and consideration must be given to the fact that society is ill-served by a legally commanded continuance of a marriage which exists in name only.Rowe v. Rowe, No. M1999-01535-COA-R3-CV, 2000 WL 679225, at *2 (Tenn.Ct.App. M.S., filed May 25, 2000) (quoting Farrar v. Farrar, 553 S.W.2d 741, 744-45 (Tenn. 1977)).