From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rowe v. Preferred Senior Care, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Feb 7, 2019
Case No: 2:18-cv-446-FtM-29MRM (M.D. Fla. Feb. 7, 2019)

Opinion

Case No: 2:18-cv-446-FtM-29MRM

02-07-2019

SHAWN ROWE, on behalf of herself and all similarly situated individuals, Plaintiff, v. PREFERRED SENIOR CARE, LLC, a Florida limited liability company and MARK WHITE, individually, Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #22), filed January 18, 2019, recommending that the Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement and Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. #21) be granted, the settlement be approved, and the case be dismissed. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table).

After conducting an independent examination of the file and upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #22) is hereby adopted and the findings incorporated herein.

2. The parties' Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement and Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. #21) is granted and the Settlement Agreement and General Release (Doc. #21-1) is approved as a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute.

3. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the case with prejudice, terminate all deadlines and motions, and close the file.

DONE and ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 7th day of February, 2019.

/s/_________

JOHN E. STEELE

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies:
Hon. Mac R. McCoy
United States Magistrate Judge Counsel of Record
Unrepresented parties


Summaries of

Rowe v. Preferred Senior Care, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Feb 7, 2019
Case No: 2:18-cv-446-FtM-29MRM (M.D. Fla. Feb. 7, 2019)
Case details for

Rowe v. Preferred Senior Care, LLC

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN ROWE, on behalf of herself and all similarly situated individuals…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Feb 7, 2019

Citations

Case No: 2:18-cv-446-FtM-29MRM (M.D. Fla. Feb. 7, 2019)