From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rowe v. Mo

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 22, 2024
3:24-cv-03113-JSC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-cv-03113-JSC

08-22-2024

RICHARD DAVID ROWE, Plaintiff, v. MO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff, who is representing himself, brought this action against Bank of America and a Mr. Mo. On May 30, 2024, Magistrate Judge Kim granted Plaintiff's in forma pauperis application and screened his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 because the nature of his claims and the basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction was unclear. (Dkt. No. 4.) Plaintiff was given until June 20, 2024 to file an amended complaint. He did not do so and the action was reassigned to the undersigned district judge. (Dkt. No. 7.) Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute in light of Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's Order and file an amended complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41(b).

Plaintiff shall file a written response to this order along with his amended complaint by September 19, 2024. If Plaintiff fails to do so, the Court may dismiss this action for failure to prosecute.

As Plaintiff is without representation by a lawyer, he may wish to contact the Legal Help Center for free assistance by calling 415-782-8982 or emailing fedpro@sfbar.org.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rowe v. Mo

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 22, 2024
3:24-cv-03113-JSC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Rowe v. Mo

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD DAVID ROWE, Plaintiff, v. MO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 22, 2024

Citations

3:24-cv-03113-JSC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2024)