From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rowe v. Carpenter

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 19, 2020
No. 20-6256 (4th Cir. Nov. 19, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-6256

11-19-2020

UHURU ROWE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL CARPENTER; NANCY PERKERSON; TERESA L. BIRCKHEAD; T. DARDEN; GREGORY HALLOWAY, Defendants - Appellees.

Jeffrey E. Fogel, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Mark R. Herring, Attorney General, Victoria N. Pearson, Deputy Attorney General, Laura Maughan, Assistant Attorney General, Toby J. Heytens, Solicitor General, Michelle S. Kallen, Deputy Solicitor General, Martine E. Cicconi, Deputy Solicitor General, Jessica Merry Samuels, Assistant Solicitor General, Zachary R. Glubiak, John Marshall Fellow, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00780-REP) Before WILKINSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey E. Fogel, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Mark R. Herring, Attorney General, Victoria N. Pearson, Deputy Attorney General, Laura Maughan, Assistant Attorney General, Toby J. Heytens, Solicitor General, Michelle S. Kallen, Deputy Solicitor General, Martine E. Cicconi, Deputy Solicitor General, Jessica Merry Samuels, Assistant Solicitor General, Zachary R. Glubiak, John Marshall Fellow, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Uhuru Rowe appeals the district court's order granting the Appellees' motion to dismiss and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rowe v. Carpenter, No. 3:18-cv-00780-REP (E.D. Va. Jan. 22, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Rowe v. Carpenter

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 19, 2020
No. 20-6256 (4th Cir. Nov. 19, 2020)
Case details for

Rowe v. Carpenter

Case Details

Full title:UHURU ROWE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL CARPENTER; NANCY PERKERSON…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 19, 2020

Citations

No. 20-6256 (4th Cir. Nov. 19, 2020)