From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rowe v. Fishing Vessel Big Jim II

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nov 27, 1963
324 F.2d 735 (3d Cir. 1963)

Opinion

No. 14448.

Argued November 7, 1963.

Decided November 27, 1963.

Edward I. Baker, Atlantic City, N.J., for appellant.

Roy L. Sykes, Norfolk, Va. (Jett, Sykes Berkley, Norfolk, Va., Walter C. Wright, Jr., Cape May, N.J., on the brief), for libelant-appellee.

Before STALEY, HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.


This appeal is from a final decree in favor of the libelant in a suit in admiralty brought to recover for damages to a vessel. The trial court found: first, that the respondent Albert Dulinski was negligent in the operation of his vessel "BIG JIM II"; second, that this negligence was solely the proximate cause of extensive damage to the vessel "SEA QUEEN", owned by the libelant; and third, that the libelant had suffered damages and losses in the total amount of $37,925.45.

The respondent here challenges these factual findings as unsupported by the evidence and clearly erroneous. We do not agree. We have examined the record in its entirety and, applying the rule announced by the Supreme Court in McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 20, 75 S.Ct. 6, 99 L.Ed. 20 (1954), we find no error. The factual findings are amply supported by evidence which the trial court apparently found credible.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.


Summaries of

Rowe v. Fishing Vessel Big Jim II

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nov 27, 1963
324 F.2d 735 (3d Cir. 1963)
Case details for

Rowe v. Fishing Vessel Big Jim II

Case Details

Full title:William R. ROWE, owner of the fishing vessel SEA QUEEN, Libelant-Appellee…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Nov 27, 1963

Citations

324 F.2d 735 (3d Cir. 1963)