From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rowe v. Ainslie

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Nov 16, 2017
SC: 155709 (Mich. Nov. 16, 2017)

Opinion

SC: 155709

11-16-2017

BILLY ROWE and ROBIN ROWE, Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. DETECTIVE/SERGEANT RONALD AINSLIE, Defendant, Cross-Appellee, and TROOPER STEVE LAMB, Defendant, and TROOPER DENNIS MILBURN, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.


Order

155709 & (65) Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Kurtis T. Wilder, Justices COA: 332566
Calhoun CC: 2013-001488-NO

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 21, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, there being no majority in favor of granting leave to appeal or taking other action.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 16, 2017

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Rowe v. Ainslie

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Nov 16, 2017
SC: 155709 (Mich. Nov. 16, 2017)
Case details for

Rowe v. Ainslie

Case Details

Full title:BILLY ROWE and ROBIN ROWE, Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Nov 16, 2017

Citations

SC: 155709 (Mich. Nov. 16, 2017)