From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rowan v. Rowan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 15, 1994
202 A.D.2d 281 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 15, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis R. Friedman, J.).


As plaintiff had obtained a divorce judgment on default in 1986 while represented by counsel and had not sought equitable distribution, and as she had accepted defendant's voluntary support payments and presented only unsupported allegations of coercion, the court properly determined there was no evidence of fraud or collusion to warrant vacatur of the divorce judgment (compare, e.g., Benitez v. Benitez, 179 A.D.2d 445).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Asch, Rubin, Williams and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Rowan v. Rowan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 15, 1994
202 A.D.2d 281 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Rowan v. Rowan

Case Details

Full title:CAROLINE ROWAN, Appellant, v. GEORGE R. ROWAN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 15, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 281 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
608 N.Y.S.2d 471

Citing Cases

Amalgamated Bank v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.

ation on the merits as is necessary to invoke that doctrine ( see People v. Evans, 94 N.Y.2d 499, 502, 706…