Opinion
Submitted February 11, 1927 —
Decided May 16, 1927.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N.J. Mis. R. 926.
For the respondent, Paul M. Salsburg.
For the appellant, William Charlton.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, BLACK, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.