From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rouzan v. Dorta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 30, 2014
Case No. CV 12-1361-BRO (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2014)

Summary

holding that defendant did not have a First Amendment right to record officials in a courthouse walkway, noting the absence of a right to record more important judicial proceedings and distinguishing the restriction from a First Amendment right to record police officers carrying out their duties in a public place

Summary of this case from Benzing v. North Carolina

Opinion

Case No. CV 12-1361-BRO (JPR)

04-30-2014

RODNEY ROUZAN, Plaintiff, v. LORENA DORTA et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of U.S. Magistrate Judge,

IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice.

__________

BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rouzan v. Dorta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 30, 2014
Case No. CV 12-1361-BRO (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2014)

holding that defendant did not have a First Amendment right to record officials in a courthouse walkway, noting the absence of a right to record more important judicial proceedings and distinguishing the restriction from a First Amendment right to record police officers carrying out their duties in a public place

Summary of this case from Benzing v. North Carolina
Case details for

Rouzan v. Dorta

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY ROUZAN, Plaintiff, v. LORENA DORTA et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 30, 2014

Citations

Case No. CV 12-1361-BRO (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2014)

Citing Cases

Benzing v. North Carolina

ons on the use of cell phones in government buildings. See Hodge v. Bd. of Cty. Comm'rs, No. CIV.A.…