Opinion
DOCKET NO. CA 11-02424 DOCKET NO. CA 11-02425 DOCKET NO. CA 11-02426 DOCKET NO. CA 11-02427 DOCKET NO. CA 11-02428 DOCKET NO. CA 11-02429 DOCKET NO. CA 12-00083
03-28-2012
ROUTE 104 & ROUTE 21 DEVELOPMENT, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHEVRON USA, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND WILLIAM J. ALLEN, JR., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 1.) ROUTE 104 & ROUTE 21 DEVELOPMENT, INC., PLAINTIFF, v. CHEVRON USA, INC. ET AL., DEFENDANTS, WILLIAM J. ALLEN, JR., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.) ROUTE 104 & ROUTE 21 DEVELOPMENT, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHEVRON USA, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, E. AND v. ENERGY CORPORATION, DAVID VAN LIERE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, AND TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 3.) ROUTE 104 & ROUTE 21 DEVELOPMENT, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHEVRON USA, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, E. AND v. ENERGY CORPORATION, AND TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 4.) ROUTE 104 & ROUTE 21 DEVELOPMENT, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT, v. CHEVRON USA, INC., DEFENDANT, E. AND v. ENERGY CORPORATION, DAVID VAN LIERE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS, WILLIAM J. ALLEN, JR., AND TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 5.) ROUTE 104 & ROUTE 21 DEVELOPMENT, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHEVRON USA, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, E. AND v. ENERGY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 6.) ROUTE 104 & ROUTE 21 DEVELOPMENT, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT v. CHEVRON U.S.A., INC. AND DAVID VAN LIERE, DEFENDANTS, E. AND v. ENERGY CORPORATION, WILLIAM J. ALLEN JR., AND TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 7.)
PRESENT: , P. J., CENTRA, FAHEY, PERADOTTO, AND LINDLEY, JJ.
Plaintiff having moved for an extension of time to perfect the appeals taken herein from orders of the Supreme Court entered in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Wayne on February 18, 2011, February 23, 2011, March 7, 2011, May 24, 2011, and December 12, 2011,
Now, upon reading and filing the affirmation of Alan J. Knauf, Esq., dated March 15, 2012, and the notice of motion with proof of service thereof, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that the second ordering paragraph of the order of this Court entered January 30, 2012, is hereby amended by deleting the date April 23, 2012, and inserting in its place the date June 22, 2012, and
It is further ORDERED that the third ordering paragraph of this Court's order entered January 30, 2012, is amended by deleting the dated July 9, 2012, and inserting in its place the date August 13, 2012, and
It is further ORDERED that the motion insofar as it seeks an extension of time to perfect the appeal from the order entered December 12, 2011, is dismissed as premature (see 22 NYCRR 1000.13 [f]).
Memorandum: No further extensions of time to perfect the appeals will be granted.
Frances E. Cafarell, Clerk