From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rousseau v. Fry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Jun 14, 2012
CASE NO. 3:12cv516(RNC) (D. Conn. Jun. 14, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:12cv516(RNC)

06-14-2012

MICHAEL ROUSSEAU, Plaintiff, v. WINTHROP W. FRY, Defendant.


NOTICE AND ORDER

The court has reviewed the file in this case to monitor the parties' compliance with Local Rule 26(e). Local Rule 26(e) provides that, within 30 days after the appearance of any defendant, the attorneys of record and any unrepresented parties must confer for the purposes described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). Local Rule 26(e) further provides that, within 10 days after the conference, the participants must jointly complete and file a report of the conference using Form 26(f).

It appears that more than forty days have passed since the appearance of a defendant in this case, but no joint report has been filed. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the parties file the required report on or before June 27, 2012.

SO ORDERED at Hartford, Connecticut this 14th day of June, 2012.

_________________________

Donna F. Martinez

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Rousseau v. Fry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Jun 14, 2012
CASE NO. 3:12cv516(RNC) (D. Conn. Jun. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Rousseau v. Fry

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ROUSSEAU, Plaintiff, v. WINTHROP W. FRY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Date published: Jun 14, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 3:12cv516(RNC) (D. Conn. Jun. 14, 2012)