From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rouser v. White

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 31, 2008
No. CIV S-93-0767 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-93-0767 LKK GGH P.

January 31, 2008


ORDER


On January 28, 2008, a further trial confirmation hearing was held before the undersigned. At this hearing, the court re-set the jury trial date, granted defendants leave to substitute as a witness Associate Warden Brazelton for Associate Warden Beels, and ordered plaintiff to file an amended witness list reflecting only those witnesses who will appear at trial.

On January 29, 2008, defendants filed a request for the court to issue a second amended pretrial order reflecting the changes to witnesses and exhibits that have occurred since filing of the amended pretrial order on October 16, 2007. Good cause appearing, this request is granted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The jury trial is set for May 13, 2008, at 10:30 a.m. in courtroom 4;

2. Within ten days of January 28, 2008, plaintiff shall file an amended witness list identifying the witnesses who will appear at trial; plaintiff should include the CDC identification number of the incarcerated witnesses; this list should only include the witnesses plaintiff has previously been granted permission to call;

3. Defendants' request to substitute Associate Warden Brazelton for Associate Warden Beels is granted;

4. Following receipt of plaintiff's amended witness list, the court will issue a second amended pretrial order.


Summaries of

Rouser v. White

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 31, 2008
No. CIV S-93-0767 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2008)
Case details for

Rouser v. White

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ROUSER, Plaintiff, v. THEO WHITE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 31, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-93-0767 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2008)